‑ 2 -
With respect to
items marked ▲, Section 139 of
the federal Criminal Code of Canada
should be considered, which includes: wilful attempts to obstruct, pervert or
defeat the course of justice.
30. On or shortly before
Monday October 22nd 1984 SNC s lawyers rejected the Report from my doctor,
Howard Schwarz, which stated that I had become un-well as a result of SNC s actions combined with the lack of
employment. The Superior Court hearing of my case had been set for Wednesday October
24th 1984, which date had been agreed early
in 1984.
▲Thus SNC rejected the report at a point when they knew perfectly
well that Mr. Schwarz could not be given the required 5 working days notice to
appear in Superior Court as a witness for the author on October 24th
See also Court Record PLUMITIF
CIVIL - EVENT 16
This precipitated a
postponement of the hearing.
31. In July 1986 Ralph A. Cohen (who became my lawyer following Mr.
I.S. Mass s resignation to become a Judge of Quebec Superior Court), wrote to
SNC s lawyers and the Court stating that he was ready to proceed with a
hearing.
▲ By November 1986, there
having been no progress at all since July 1986, I ‑ accompanied by lawyer Ralph
A. Cohen s partner Anna Zampini inspected the Court House file and discovered
the reason for the delay i.e. that SNC s lawyers had failed to reply to Ralph A. Cohen s letter
of July 1986. This four‑month delay was totally unnecessary and constituted part
of an emerging pattern of continued delay tactics calculated to waste my time
and increase my legal costs ‑ in order to obstruct, pervert or defeat the
course of justice.
The only reason
why they got away with it was the – quote - …before the courts… - unquote -
phenomenon, which shielded them from questioning by outsiders such as media
reporters.
See also Court Record
(Plumitif Civil) PLUMITIF
CIVIL - EVENT 19
32. In a letter dated February 5th 1987 to Jean‑Paul
Gourdeau, then Chairman and C.E.O. of SNC from Mr. A J.
Fisher, Mr. Fisher asked on my behalf about the possibility of an out of court
settlement. Mr. Fisher was Service Officer of 306 Wing Royal Canadian Air Force
Association (in Montreal, Quebec), of which I was a member at that time.
Letter from Mr. Fisher to Jean-Paul Gourdeau - CLICK HERE
As a result, SNC s lawyers
agreed to a meeting but with my lawyer only, which meeting then occurred on
April 9th 1987. Present were Anna Zampini of Ralph A. Cohen and Associates
representing Chisholm, and Brigitte Charron of Dunton Rainville representing
SNC.
▲ It is reported
that Brigitte Charron said that I
had already been given – quote - about 6 months – unquote - indemnity when she
knew, or should have known, that this
was untrue.
See also Court Record (Plumitif Civil)
PLUMITIF CIVIL - EVENT 27
... /3
With respect to
items marked ▲, Section 139 of
the federal Criminal Code of Canada
should be considered, which includes: wilful attempts to obstruct, pervert or
defeat the course of justice.